Safe, natural-appearing, and predictable results are top priorities with any aesthetic treatment I perform. I chose the Puregraft system because it delivers all of this in an elegant, simple, and cost-effective system. The support provided by the company is also top notch. My patients and I are absolutely thrilled with the results.

Puregraft delivers high quality fat in a very simple way.

Puregraft enables me to provide my patients with sufficient fat graft volume. I use Puregraft for fat grafting as a standard.

“We have done our due diligence and truly believe in using Puregraft to give our patients the best fat transfer results. The procedure is fast and painless, and gives us a great, natural looking result every time.”

The introduction of Puregraft 50 to our practice has improved the outcome of fat transfer to traditionally challenging areas on the face.  Our practice is unique in that we use fat transfer aggressively for both facial contouring and rejuvenation in an ethnically and age-diverse population.  We commonly use fat transfer to augment the forehead, temples, nasal dorsum, midface and chin.  In my experience, Puregraft provides a consistently better take in these cosmetically-sensitive areas. The closed system ensures process sterility and the filtered fat is superior in both appearance and retention compared to those processed by traditional centrifugation techniques.

Puregraft made me feel comfortable offering fat grafting to my patients. It resolved my concerns of safety and reliability and gave me the highest quality of fat compared to other products on the market.

I have been using the Puregraft system since 2010.  I first started fat grafting after attending a course in Miami.   In the meantime, I found the Puregraft system.  It didn’t take many surgeries to become comfortable with the system.   I like the consistency of the fat that is produced and the ease of use of the filter.  Although I have never officially studied my actual “take” in my patients,  I am sure I would notice (as would the patient) any fat loss of 20% or more….but I don’t. I use this system for both my breast reconstructions and my cosmetic surgeries.

The Puregraft method in comparison to gravity separation and fractional centrifugation allows us to obtain better results in filtrating blood, free lipids and excess fluid. It also prevents creation of early inflammatory reaction and fat necrosis and in turn results in better graft survival.

Since I started using Puregraft, I receive the best quality of fat tissue for lipofilling.

In a closed system such as Puregraft, handled in a very gentle way with mild massaging and without being exposed to air, the viability of the cells that we examined were in the 95% plus range.

Puregraft gives me the highest quality fat for more consistent injections and results. Puregraft fat injects more like an HA.

Simply put, there is no more elegant, reliable, and reproducible way to harvest, clean, separate and transfer fat grafts than Puregraft!

With the Puregraft system, I can do high volume fat grafting with precision and have a very low complication rate. I have been shocked by how much the fat takes. I tried several other systems but I believe Puregraft is the gold standard. In my opinion it is the gentlest way of processing fat. I offer it to 100% of my breast reconstruction patients and 95% of them take me up on it.

We like the simplicity of Puregraft. It has definitely sped up the OR process and is more efficient than other methods we have used previously. It was very easy from the very first time. It takes only 5-10 minutes to harvest and lay out the fat with Puregraft.

We have been using the Puregraft system for over 4 years now. The hospital was searching for a system with clear sterilization parameters. I felt strongly a closed system would be best. With Puregraft, fat graft take has been quite good and the system is easy to use. The white paper which illustrated a significant reduction in lipid was impressive to me. I believe this to be important for both graft survival and to reduce the potential developed lipid cysts, especially in breast reconstruction patients.

Something that does not show up in the lab crystalloid analysis…Puregraft fat offers more aesthetic feedback during injection. The graft is cohesive. In a large volume case it absolutely matters that you are able to count on a consistent graft. I feel I can trust the graft and the recent Aesthetic Surgery Journal clinical bakcs up my anecdotal observations. The graft yield allows me to focus on the body contouring aspects of the surgery.

Puregraft offers me unmatched precision. Each injection thread is more productive and provides greater aesthetic feedback. The overall graft viscosity is consistent and free of fluid contaminants. Less graft variables moves the surgery toward standardization and the net result is a more precise and reproducible facial rejuvenation.

I have been using Puregraft for about 4 years now.  I started using the product because centrifugation of harvested fat produced inconsistent material for transfer.  Puregraft adds consistency to the procedure and has been a great addition.